Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard Triad Airlines Flight 123 to
Kookamonga. Please direct your attention to the flight attendants at
the front of the cabin. They will demonstrate the operation of your
ejection seats. Please don't remove the arming pin until we're
airborne. Thank you."
Every passenger has thought at least once about the fact that
airliners carry life vests and oxygen masks for their passengers but
not parachutes. It hasn't always been that way, however. In the
1920s, the airlines used passenger parachutes as a major marketing
strategy. In 1929, Aero Digest Magazine found that more than 90
percent of airline passengers wanted parachutes aboard--even though
the chances of a parachute saving a passenger's life in the event of
a plane wreck were slim.
However, the customer is always right, so passenger chutes were
developed. The first was a simple chest style that clipped onto a
harness passengers donned beforeboarding the plane. This gave way to
a seat-type parachute. After sitting down and putting on their
shoulder harnesses and seat belts, passengers were ready to jump if
necessary.
The trouble with these types of chutes was that passengers would be
required to calmly make their way to the back door and bail out when
the need arose. However, anyone who has tried to disembark an
airliner under normal circumstances will immediately see the problem
inherent in a mass bailout. And from a weight and balance
standpoint, the pilots trying to fly a failing airplane aren't going
to appreciate the heavy passengers heading en masse for the plane's
tail.
In the late 1920s, the Switlick Co. came up with a solution called
the Airplane Safety Seat. Here's how it was supposed to work:
Passengers strapped themselves into ordinary-looking seats; in an
emergency, the captain had a big lever--and a decision to make. If
he believed the organic material was about to hit the fan, he'd pull
the lever, locking the passengers into their seats and surrounding
them with their chutes. The captain would then release the trapdoor
located under each seat, and the passengers would fall through the
floor and into the wild blue yonder.
Although the Airplane Safety Seat tested well, it never became
standard airline equipment. These days, the idea of personal
ejection seats would give the world's lawyers multiple orgasms.
Imagine the tort cases that could arise from ejecting passengers
from a jet without warning--at 500 knots, from 35,000 feet!
Some companies, however, are trying to develop a parachute for the
airplane itself. Ballistic Recovery Systems Inc. of St. Paul, Minn.,
has created chutes for ultralight aircraft and small planes such as
the Cessna 150. To date, however, it has found that any chute large
enough for a 727 would be heavier than the airliner's passenger
load.
Passenger Discipline
As a captain, I'd like to see individual passenger-ejection seats.
Giving the flight attendant grief? I'd simply select your seat,
punch a little green button and away you'd go! Or let's say we're in
a holding pattern outside La Guardia Airport, right above Manhattan,
and all the passengers are going to miss important business
meetings. I could eject them all, and they'd make a soft landing on
Wall Street. In addition, ejection seats could relieve airline
terminal congestion. Why fly a passenger all the way to Chicago if
he or she really wants to go to Crystal Lake, Ill.? Just drop that
person out over his or her hometown.
There are obvious drawbacks to such a system, however. Because the
passenger-ejection seats would fire through the jet's floor,
passengers would be flung through all the baggage on their way down.
And if a seat misfired while the plane was in line for takeoff, the
passenger would be driven about 5 feet into the taxiway, creating a
messy pothole.
Perhaps the system is best left the way it is: We all get wiped out
at the same time if there's a crash; we all arrive late if there's a
delay.
Tort attorneys have enough work already.